- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
I've taught technology in a lab setting to K-5 students for the last 3 years. I have to say that I am completely at a disadvantage when the Smartboard doesn't work. My classroom management style consists of my modeling the day's lesson on the Smartboard, while students are at the carpet area. We then clarify, monitor and adjust as students do it with me, and I check for understanding. Students then go to their personal computer to practice what they just learned. Without modeling at the carpet area, students are truly lost. They have trouble following along at their individual computer while I use Synchroneyes. When at the carpet area, we can use and go over any handouts or other aids before touching the computer. The students are focussed on learning and can't wait to go to the computer. They know that they will not be able to touch the computer until they understand what their 'job' for the day will be (standard/s). It is very difficult to teach a student all the steps in a process (for example: opening Word, typing a poem, and saving it) without them seeing it modeled first. Young students can't use a manual either. Having a writing prompt template at the computer helps, but only if they have seen how to use it first. I've seen teachers use one computer with all students crowded around to see it, but it truly isn't as effective as using the Smartboard. The Notebook software offers the teacher so many tools to aid in instruction as well.
I know the junior high teachers in my district don't use the carpet area, but the students are locked out of their computers (using Synchroneyes software) while the student watches the teacher at the Smartboard first.
I'm not a sales representative for Smart Technologies, but I believe every classroom could benefit from one.
Hello everyone.
My name is Batavia Domingue and I am a Technology Instructor at a private school located in Stockbridge, GA, about 25 miles south of Atlanta. I have been in technology for over 15 years but I had a strong desire to teach technology. I was afforded the opportunity to do so last year and have jumped right in. It's amazing to see how my students are so eager to learn and how much is out there for me to teach them. I am still learning all about the free tools, software, and curriculum that is out there that deals with technology but now I am faced with a problem that I really need help with.
My fellow IT colleague and I are having a debate that I would love some assistance in supporting my point. They say that smart boards ARE NOT needed in a school computer lab because the content that we teach does not require it. I beg to differ but I have no concrete evidence and lessons that support why I should be allowed to have one in the lab. It seems to me like there is so much that I could do with a smart board but I am not sure what? I figured that you, my DEN supporters could help me prove them wrong.
Any ideas that you may have would be greatly appreciated. If I can show them how and why I need to purchase two boards (one from the elementary lab grades K-5 and the other for the middle/high school lab) then I truly believe that I could and will be able to take our students to next level educationally and technologically.
Thank you so much.
Batavia Domingue
Ms. B